Czechia water: Vodní_plocha, Vodní_tok and the DIBAVOD name join (water_bodies, waterways, water_points) #221
Labels
No labels
blocked
claude-wip
map-report
map:is
map:se
needs-review
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
art/ismap#221
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Gated on #212 and #215.
All three water layers come from ZABAGED® polohopis
(
https://ags.cuzk.gov.cz/arcgis/services/ZABAGED_POLOHOPIS/MapServer/WFSServer,anonymous, CC BY 4.0). Counts verified live 2026-08-24.
water_bodies←Vodní_plocha, 91 667 polygons, withJMENO(name) andTYP_VP_P(e.g.rybník). Czechia has tens of thousands of fishponds, so the layerneeds a size/type filter argued in the config, not a blanket import — that reasoning goes
next to the query (AGENTS.md).
waterways←Vodní_tok, 358 804 lines, withidvt(watercourse id),chp(hydrological basin code),typtoku_p,vydattok_p(permanent/intermittent).No inline name.
water_points←Zdroj_podzemních_vod(35 224 springs) andVodopád__bod_(386 waterfalls), plusVodopád__linie_.The two things this issue has to establish, not assume
idvtis the join key to DIBAVOD / CEVT (VÚV TGM,dibavod.cz— resolves, not yet fetched). Confirm the licence (R2) and the joinbefore wiring it. If DIBAVOD is not usable, waterways ship unnamed and that is a written
fact, not a gap left silent.
Vodní_tokis a surveyed network with basin codes, soconnectivity is plausible — and plausible is not verified. Test whether the segments
actually join end-to-end before relying on the Strahler derivation, the way Greece's
waterways issue had to.
Acceptance tests in the same commit, per layer, and the
make acceptancetally in the PR.