Place names importance ladder. #71
Labels
No labels
blocked
claude-wip
map-report
map:is
map:se
needs-review
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
art-bot
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
art/ismap#71
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Finland is showing too many place names. Helsinki is crowded out from rendering at most zoom levels.
At z5 we should only have 3-6 place names per country.
Figure out a measurement of average on ground size of a place name label, set up the generalization such that at most X% of the country size is covered (not by actually measuring this when doing generalization, but just by estimates when designing which labels to include). I don't know what X should be, figure out a decent measure or give me options to try (I'm assuming that place name generalization cascade should be pretty fast).
Result is in #72 — #72; the review note is the PR description.