Water deepening: names, ditches, reservoirs #21
Labels
No labels
claude-wip
map-report
map:is
map:se
needs-review
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
art/ismap#21
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Three separate gaps in the water layers, all needing a dataset we do not currently fetch,
so all were out of scope under Phase 3's stopping rule ("no new source datasets to reach a
deeper class"). All are cheap-ish to revisit.
Names — only Poland labels its water. BDOT10k carries
NAZWAon 87% of river polygons,1.8% of lakes and every large canal, so the style's
water_body_labels/waterway_labelstoday label Poland alone. Iceland's names would come from the LMÍ örnefni dataset (which
is already fetched and unimported, and would also fix unnamed peaks and unnamed
waterfalls/springs); Sweden's from the Topo 10
texttheme, which is in the Geotorget orderwe already have. This is the highest-value of the three.
Ditches. Iceland's
vatnafarhas 93.6k (yfirbordsvatn = 2) and Poland's BDOT10k hasOT_SWRM_L; both are deliberately excluded today. If they are ever wanted, note thatIceland's would have to be kept out of the Strahler graph — they are not part of the
natural drainage network and would distort the stream ordering.
Sweden's reservoirs. Topo 10
markdistinguishes 2634 "Anlagt vatten" and carries areglerat_vattenflag. Both collapse tolaketoday because the sharedwatervocabularyhas no
reservoirand no other country can produce one — so this one is a vocabularydecision first, not an import.