The world carve's residual is a missing maritime boundary — coasts and land borders ask the same question with opposite answers #186
Labels
No labels
blocked
claude-wip
map-report
map:is
map:se
needs-review
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
art/ismap#186
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
#184 fixed the world carve by subtracting Natural Earth's own admin-0 polygons instead of our
country masks, and #185 cut the residual another 4× by moving from 1:110m to 1:10m. What is
left is irreducible with the data we currently have, and it is worth writing down why.
The irreducible bit
background_landis Natural Earth land minus the countries we draw ourselves. Two questionshave to be answered at the edge of a country, and only one dataset can answer them:
resolve the Gulf of Corinth at all). We must carve that, or it draws as land in the sea.
off the national one. We must not carve past it, or the neighbour's land draws as sea.
Both look identical in the data: "Natural Earth says land here, and the country we imported
says nothing." The Gulf of Messenia and a strip of Norway are the same query result. Nothing
distinguishes them except knowing where the country's territory actually ends including its
waters — a maritime boundary.
Measured residual at 1:10m (R146):
pl=1 930,fi=627,gr=515,se=374,is=0km².Things already tried and rejected, with numbers
Natural Earth land left inside our countries — grey wedges in every gulf. #184.
2 429 → 40 km², and the map still showed a 1 km line straight through it, because coastal
water bodies reach ~2 km and Natural Earth's error in an open gulf is tens of kilometres.
generalization error.
trades the two errors roughly 1:1. At 1:10m with a 2 km band,
plunfilled drops1 930 → 626 km² while 3 034 km² of Natural Earth land returns inside Poland. Rejected.
borders structurally correct — there is no subtraction at a border at all — but moves the
same ambiguity to the coast, where the gulfs come back as land. It does not remove the need
for a maritime boundary; it changes which error is free. Worth revisiting only alongside
this issue, not instead of it.
What would actually close it
A per-country polygon of land + territorial waters, so the carve is "our territory" rather
than "Natural Earth's guess at our territory". Then:
Candidate: Marine Regions (VLIZ / Flanders Marine Institute), which publishes a Union of
EEZ and land dataset — one polygon per country covering land plus its maritime zone, and an
eez_12nmterritorial-seas layer. CC BY 4.0. It is a third party rather than a nationalagency, which is a real question against R1 — but it would sit in the same slot Natural Earth
already occupies: a global reference dataset for the background, not a country's own data.
That call is worth making explicitly rather than by default.
Worth checking first, before adopting a third party:
borders that matter. If it is derived from the same generalized sources, it buys nothing on
the border side and only helps the coast.
Greece publishes WFD coastal water bodies (too narrow, measured above), but several states
publish full territorial-sea limits, which would keep the no-third-party property.
Also here
Poland is the outlier at 1 930 km², three times the next country, and its border with
Belarus and Ukraine renders clean — so the area is probably concentrated somewhere specific
(the Vistula Lagoon and the Kaliningrad boundary are the obvious suspects) and may be Poland's
own mask rather than Natural Earth. Localise it before assuming it is the same problem: